Fading Multi-Day Dollar Moves: A Quantitative Case for Mean Reversion
The dollar's four-day rally post-FOMC raises a key question: fade or follow? Recent years of data reveals which strategy wins on extended moves.
The dollar has posted four consecutive days of gains against the euro following the October FOMC meeting, where Powell's commentary on potentially pausing rate cuts in December shifted market expectations. With this extended directional move underway, traders face a fundamental question: do multi-day dollar streaks favor momentum continuation or mean reversion? A backtest using six years of price data provides clear takeaways.
Market Context
The recent FOMC meeting catalyzed sustained dollar strength across major currencies with minimal false breakouts. Powell's suggestion that the next cut may not arrive in December contradicted what markets had largely priced in heading into the decision. The result has been four straight days of dollar appreciation—a notable development in a year where FX volatility has been relatively subdued compared to other asset classes.
Trading spot FX markets requires outright directional positioning. Every trade involves buying one currency against another, creating pure relative-value plays. This reality makes the momentum versus contrarian debate particularly relevant for traders seeking to engage these markets effectively.
Methodology
The analysis examined six years of daily close data across major dollar pairs, isolating three-day directional streaks in both directions. To filter for meaningful volatility, only streaks exceeding 1% cumulative movement qualified for inclusion. In FX markets where a 0.5% daily move represents an outsized session, this threshold established a sound benchmark for notable directional pressure.
Methodology note: Backtest assumes profit targets are filled before stop losses when both levels are reached intraday, which occurred in a minority of cases. This explains why opposite strategies don't sum to exactly 100% win rate while still demonstrating clear relative performance differences.
Test Parameters:
- Symmetric 0.75% profit and stop loss targets
- Five-day maximum holding period
- Position sizing: one standard lot per trade
- Margin requirements: ~$1,700-$6,000 depending on pair
- The study calculated win rates, average P&L, and ROI across two distinct approaches: entering in the direction of the three-day streak (momentum) versus fading the move (contrarian).
Results: Contrarian Strategies Dominate
Momentum Performance
Trend-following entries underperformed across the dataset. Win rates fell below 50% for most major pairs, with only USD/CHF and USD/JPY marginally exceeding breakeven. Average P&L figures on 1-lot trades skewed negative, and typical holding periods of three days suggested positions either hit stops quickly or stagnated before resolution.
| Symbol | Win Rate | Average Days Held | Average P/L ($) | Average ROI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EUR/USD | 41.57% | 2.95 | ($129.82) | -5.61% |
| GBP/USD | 47.90% | 2.62 | ($66.61) | -1.01% |
| USD/JPY | 51.61% | 2.31 | $16.33 | 0.33% |
| USD/CAD | 43.55% | 3.24 | ($71.76) | -3.59% |
| AUD/USD | 49.10% | 2.47 | ($4.07) | -0.21% |
| USD/CHF | 50.82% | 3.03 | $23.69 | 0.79% |
| NZD/USD | 48.37% | 2.45 | ($16.14) | -0.94% |
Contrarian Performance
Fading three-day directional streaks produced materially superior results. Win rates exceeded 50% across major pairs, with EUR/USD leading at 59%. Average holding periods remained similar at just under three days, but P&L outcomes improved significantly.
| Symbol | Win Rate | Average Days Held | Average P/L ($) | Average ROI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EUR/USD | 59.04% | 2.95 | $140.27 | 6.06% |
| GBP/USD | 54.20% | 2.62 | $108.06 | 1.64% |
| USD/JPY | 53.46% | 2.31 | $59.71 | 1.19% |
| USD/CAD | 57.26% | 3.24 | $83.86 | 4.19% |
| AUD/USD | 53.76% | 2.47 | $32.24 | 1.64% |
| USD/CHF | 49.18% | 3.03 | ($23.69) | -0.79% |
| NZD/USD | 55.56% | 2.45 | $49.86 | 2.90% |
EUR/USD delivered $140 average profit per standard lot on approximately $2,300 in required margin—a strong risk-adjusted return. The pair's combination of lower margin requirements and consistent mean-reversion behavior positioned it as the optimal vehicle for this strategy.
USD/CHF represented an outlier, showing weak performance for both momentum and contrarian approaches. The pair's historically lower volatility profile, even amid 2025's more dynamic environment, produced fewer qualifying occurrences and less predictable outcomes.
Market Structure Considerations
Major dollar pairs exhibit mean-reverting characteristics over intermediate timeframes. Three-day directional streaks, particularly those clearing the 1% threshold, tend to exhaust near-term momentum and establish conditions for technical pullbacks. The leverage inherent in FX amplifies these reversions into meaningful percentage returns.
However, this year has introduced new dynamics. For example, USD/CHF volatility has increased substantially with higher correlation to EUR/USD as flight-to-quality flows respond to what appears to be a de-dollarization theme under the current administration. This represents a departure from the pair's behavior across the broader six-year sample and has contributed to 10% dollar depreciation year-to-date.
Takeaways
Historical data strongly favors contrarian positioning when major dollar pairs establish three-day directional streaks. Despite symmetric risk-reward parameters that should theoretically produce 50-50 outcomes, mean reversion strategies consistently delivered superior win rates and average returns.
EUR/USD offers the most compelling risk-adjusted opportunity for fading extended moves, combining statistical edge with favorable margin efficiency. USD/CHF lacks clear directional signals under these parameters, suggesting the strategy framework may not align well with that pair's specific price behavior.
The analysis acknowledges a fundamental tension in quantitative work: larger datasets provide statistical confidence, but shorter sampling periods may better capture current regime characteristics. For short-term trading strategies, excessive historical data may dilute exposure to present market structure—similar to how exponential moving averages weight recent price action more heavily than simple averages.
Watch the video
Analysis based on one standard lot sizing with symmetric 0.75% profit and stop loss targets and five-day maximum holding periods. Margin requirements vary by pair from approximately ~$1,700-$6,000 at current exchange rates. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
How to trade forex
- Open an account to get started, or practice on a demo account
- Choose your forex trading platform
- Open, monitor, and close positions on FX pairs
Trading forex requires an account with a forex provider like tastyfx. Many traders also watch major forex pairs like EUR/USD and USD/JPY for potential opportunities based on economic events such as inflation releases or interest rate decisions. Economic events can produce more volatility for forex pairs, which can mean greater potential profits and losses as risks can increase at these times.
You can help develop your forex trading strategies using resources like tastyfx’s YouTube channel. Our curated playlists can help you stay up to date on current markets and understanding key terms. Once your strategy is developed, you can follow the above steps to opening an account and getting started trading forex.
Your profit or loss is calculated according to your full position size. Leverage will magnify both your profits and losses. It’s important to manage your risks carefully as losses can exceed your deposit. Ensure you understand the risks and benefits associated with trading leveraged products before you start trading with them. Trade using money you’re comfortable losing.